Case Title and Number:
WWP v. Dyer, 04-cv-181-BLW (D. Idaho)
This long-standing litigation challenges BLM’s mismanagement of grazing in the Jarbidge Resource Area of southern Idaho, which has harmed sage-grouse, pygmy rabbits, and other sensitive sagebrush-obligate species and their habitats. Our first court victory, in 2004, held that BLM violated NEPA in approving "temporary" grazing increases sought by Simplot Co. and other major corporate ranchers. In 2005, the court held that BLM violated NEPA and FLPMA in approving long-term grazing increases despite a sharp decline in Jarbidge sage-grouse populations. See Western Watersheds Project v. Bennett, 392 F.Supp.2d 1217 (D. Idaho 2005). After the massive Murphy Fire burned 70% of the remaining Jarbidge sage grouse nesting habitat in 2007, the court held a 2-week trial and ruled in February 2009 that "grazing-as-usual" must end in order to protect sage-grouse.